The connecting peptide, or C-peptide, is a short 31-amino-acid polypeptide that connects insulin’s A-chain to its B-chain in the proinsulin molecule. In the context of diabetes or hypoglycemia, a measurement of C-peptide blood serum levels can be used to distinguish between different conditions with similar clinical features.

In the insulin synthesis pathway, first preproinsulin is translocated into the endoplasmic reticulum of beta cells of the pancreas with an A-chain, a C-peptide, a B-chain, and a signal sequence. The signal sequence is cleaved from the N-terminus of the peptide by a signal peptidase, leaving proinsulin. After proinsulin is packaged into vesicles in the Golgi apparatus (beta-granules), the C-peptide is removed, leaving the A-chain and B-chain bound together by disulfide bonds, that constitute the insulin molecule.

Cellular effects of C-peptide
C-peptide has been shown to bind to the surface of a number of cell types such as neuronal, endothelial, fibroblast and renal tubular, at nanomolar concentrations to a receptor that is likely G-protein-coupled. The signal activates Ca2+-dependent intracellular signaling pathways such as MAPK, PLCγ, and PKC, leading to upregulation of a range of transcription factors as well as eNOS and Na+K+ATPase activities.[3] The latter two enzymes are known to have reduced activities in patients with type I diabetes and have been implicated in the development of long-term complications of type I diabetes such as peripheral and autonomic neuropathy.

In vivo studies in animal models of type 1 diabetes have established that C-peptide administration results in significant improvements in nerve and kidney function. Thus, in animals with early signs of diabetes-induced neuropathy, C peptide treatment in replacement dosage results in improved peripheral nerve function, as evidenced by increased nerve conduction velocity, increased nerve Na+,K+ ATPase activity, and significant amelioration of nerve structural changes.[4] Likewise, C-peptide administration in animals that had C-peptide deficiency (type 1 model) with nephropathy improves renal function and structure; it decreases urinary albumin excretion and prevents or decreases diabetes-induced glomerular changes secondary to mesangial matrix expansion.[5][6][7][8] C-peptide also has been reported to have anti-inflammatory effects as well as aid repair of smooth muscle cells.[9][10] A recent epidemiologic study suggests a U-shaped relationship between C-peptide levels and risk of cardiovascular disease.[11]

Clinical uses of C-peptide testing
Patients with diabetes may have their C-peptide levels measured as a means of distinguishing type 1 diabetes from type 2 diabetes or Maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY).[12] Measuring C-peptide can help to determine how much of their own natural insulin a person is producing as C-peptide is secreted in equimolar amounts to insulin. C-peptide levels are measured instead of insulin levels because C-peptide can assess a person’s own insulin secretion even if they receive insulin injections, and because the liver metabolizes a large and variable amount of insulin secreted into the portal vein but does not metabolise C-peptide, meaning blood C-peptide may be a better measure of portal insulin secretion than insulin itself.[13][14] A very low C-peptide confirms Type 1 diabetes and insulin dependence and is associated with high glucose variability, hyperglycaemia and increased complications. The test may be less helpful close to diagnosis, particularly where a patient is overweight and insulin resistant, as levels close to diagnosis in Type 1 diabetes may be high and overlap with those seen in type 2 diabetes.[15]
Differential diagnosis of hypoglycemia. The test may be used to help determine the cause of hypoglycaemia (low glucose), values will be low if a person has taken an overdose of insulin but not suppressed if hypoglycaemia is due to an insulinoma or sulphonylureas.
Factitious (or factitial) hypoglycemia may occur secondary to the surreptitious use of insulin. Measuring C-peptide levels will help differentiate a healthy patient from a diabetic one.
C-peptide may be used for determining the possibility of gastrinomas associated with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasm syndromes (MEN 1). Since a significant number of gastrinomas are associated with MEN involving other hormone producing organs (pancreas, parathyroids, and pituitary), higher levels of C-peptide together with the presence of a gastrinoma suggest that organs besides the stomach may harbor neoplasms.
C-peptide levels may be checked in women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) to help determine degree of insulin resistance.

References
C-Peptide – Compound Summary, PubChem.
Steiner DF, Cunningham D, Spigelman L, Aten B (August 1967). “Insulin biosynthesis: evidence for a precursor”. Science. 157 (3789): 697–700. doi:10.1126/science.157.3789.697. PMID 4291105. S2CID 29382220.
Hills CE, Brunskill NJ (2008). “Intracellular signalling by C-peptide”. Experimental Diabetes Research. 2008: 635158. doi:10.1155/2008/635158. PMC 2276616. PMID 18382618.
Sima AA, Zhang W, Sugimoto K, Henry D, Li Z, Wahren J, Grunberger G (July 2001). “C-peptide prevents and improves chronic Type I diabetic polyneuropathy in the BB/Wor rat”. Diabetologia. 44 (7): 889–97. doi:10.1007/s001250100570. PMID 11508275.
Samnegård B, Jacobson SH, Jaremko G, Johansson BL, Sjöquist M (October 2001). “Effects of C-peptide on glomerular and renal size and renal function in diabetic rats”. Kidney International. 60 (4): 1258–65. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00964.x. PMID 11576340.
Samnegård B, Jacobson SH, Jaremko G, Johansson BL, Ekberg K, Isaksson B, et al. (March 2005). “C-peptide prevents glomerular hypertrophy and mesangial matrix expansion in diabetic rats”. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation. 20 (3): 532–8. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh683. PMID 15665028.
Nordquist L, Brown R, Fasching A, Persson P, Palm F (November 2009). “Proinsulin C-peptide reduces diabetes-induced glomerular hyperfiltration via efferent arteriole dilation and inhibition of tubular sodium reabsorption”. American Journal of Physiology. Renal Physiology. 297 (5): F1265-72. doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00228.2009. PMC 2781335. PMID 19741019.
Nordquist L, Wahren J (2009). “C-Peptide: the missing link in diabetic nephropathy?”. The Review of Diabetic Studies. 6 (3): 203–10. doi:10.1900/RDS.2009.6.203. PMC 2827272. PMID 20039009.
Luppi P, Cifarelli V, Tse H, Piganelli J, Trucco M (August 2008). “Human C-peptide antagonises high glucose-induced endothelial dysfunction through the nuclear factor-kappaB pathway”. Diabetologia. 51 (8): 1534–43. doi:10.1007/s00125-008-1032-x. PMID 18493738.
Mughal RS, Scragg JL, Lister P, Warburton P, Riches K, O’Regan DJ, et al. (August 2010). “Cellular mechanisms by which proinsulin C-peptide prevents insulin-induced neointima formation in human saphenous vein”. Diabetologia. 53 (8): 1761–71. doi:10.1007/s00125-010-1736-6. PMC 2892072. PMID 20461358.
Koska J, Nuyujukian DS, Bahn G, Zhou JJ, Reaven PD (2021). “Association of low fasting C-peptide levels with cardiovascular risk, visit-to-visit glucose variation and severe hypoglycemia in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial (VADT)”. Cardiovascular Diabetology. 20. doi:10.1186/s12933-021-01418-z.
Jones AG, Hattersley AT (July 2013). “The clinical utility of C-peptide measurement in the care of patients with diabetes”. Diabetic Medicine. 30 (7): 803–17. doi:10.1111/dme.12159. PMC 3748788. PMID 23413806.
Clark PM (September 1999). “Assays for insulin, proinsulin(s) and C-peptide”. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry. 36 ( Pt 5) (5): 541–64. doi:10.1177/000456329903600501. PMID 10505204.
Shapiro ET, Tillil H, Rubenstein AH, Polonsky KS (November 1988). “Peripheral insulin parallels changes in insulin secretion more closely than C-peptide after bolus intravenous glucose administration”. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 67 (5): 1094–9. doi:10.1210/jcem-67-5-1094. PMID 3053748.
R, Chandini; Udayabhaskaran V; Binoy J Paul; K.P Ramamoorthy (July 2013). “A study of non-obese diabetes mellitus in adults in a tertiary care hospital in Kerala, India”. International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries. 33 (2): 83–85. doi:10.1007/s13410-013-0113-7. S2CID 71767996.
Brunskill NJ (January 2017). “C-peptide and diabetic kidney disease”. Journal of Internal Medicine. 281 (1): 41–51. doi:10.1111/joim.12548. PMID 27640884.
Shaw JA, Shetty P, Burns KD, Fergusson D, Knoll GA (2015). “C-peptide as a Therapy for Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. PLOS ONE. 10 (5): e0127439. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127439. PMC 4439165. PMID 25993479.
“C-peptide – Creative Peptides -“. AdisInsight. Retrieved 22 October 2016.
“C-peptide – Eli Lilly”. AdisInsight. Retrieved 22 October 2016.
“C-peptide long-acting – Cebix”. adisinsight.springer.com. AdisInsight. Retrieved 22 October 2016.
Bigelow BV (23 February 2015). “Cebix Shuts Down Following Mid-Stage Trial of C-Peptide Drug”. Xconomy.
Garde D (February 24, 2015). “Cebix hangs it up after raising $50M for diabetes drug”. FierceBiotech.